- Sen. Rand Paul asserts that the COVID-19 pandemic originated from a lab leak in Wuhan, China, and accuses the Chinese Communist Party of covering it up.
- The origins of COVID-19 are debated between natural spillover and a lab leak, with many U.S. experts now favoring the latter as more plausible.
- Early in 2020, Chinese officials downplayed the virus, but virologist Zhang Yongzhen’s sequencing of the virus revealed its genetic makeup before he was silenced by the government.
- Scientists initially questioned COVID-19’s natural origins but later published the “Proximal Origin” paper, which dismissed the lab leak theory, despite private doubts.
- Gain-of-function research, supported by Anthony Fauci and conducted in Wuhan, has fueled suspicions that such experiments may have led to the virus’s accidental release.
(Natural News)—Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is absolutely certain that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is the result of a lab leak being covered up.
This is according to his book “Deception: The Great COVID Cover-up,” which detailed how the origins of the mysterious pneumonia that started spreading in the early days of 2020 in Wuhan, China and spiraled into a global pandemic that killed millions and shattered economies, is the fault of the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing refusing to take responsibility for its disastrous actions.
The origins of COVID-19 remain a fiercely debated topic, with two primary theories emerging: natural spillover from animals to humans and a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the latter of which most experts in the United States now believe to be the more plausible explanation.
In January 2020, reports of a novel coronavirus emerged from Wuhan. Initially, Chinese officials downplayed the virus’s transmissibility, but the truth soon became apparent. The virus was highly contagious and deadly. As the world scrambled to understand the threat, virologist Zhang Yongzhen sequenced the virus, only to be silenced by the Chinese government. His findings, however, were eventually published online, revealing the virus’s genetic sequence.
Then-head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dr. Robert Redfield was among the first to voice concerns about the virus’s potential lab origin. He contacted key scientists, including Anthony Fauci, urging them to consider the lab-leak hypothesis. However, Fauci, who had previously approved gain-of-function research in Wuhan, dismissed Redfield’s concerns. This dismissal set the stage for a contentious debate over the virus’s origins. (Related: THEY KNEW: The FBI was aware of coronavirus engineering and a potential lab leak for SARS-CoV-2 in March of 2020.)
Scientists worked together to discredit lab leak theory
In the ensuing weeks, a group of virologists, including Kristian Andersen and Robert Garry, initially expressed concerns that COVID-19’s genome appeared inconsistent with natural evolution. However, within days, they reversed their stance and authored the “Proximal Origin” paper, which argued against a lab leak. This paper, published in Nature, became a cornerstone of the natural-origin narrative, despite the authors’ private doubts.
The controversy deepened with the publication of a letter in The Lancet, signed by prominent scientists, including Peter Daszak, who had financial ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The letter condemned the lab leak theory as a “conspiracy theory” and called for solidarity with Chinese colleagues. This letter, later revealed to be orchestrated by Daszak, further polarized the scientific community and the public.
Gain-of-function research, which involves enhancing the transmissibility or lethality of viruses, has been a contentious issue for years. Fauci, a longtime proponent of this research, had approved funding for experiments in Wuhan that aimed to make bat coronaviruses more infectious to humans. Critics argue that this research could have led to the accidental release of COVID-19.
The origins of COVID-19 remain shrouded in uncertainty, but the evidence supporting the lab leak hypothesis continues to mount. The role of gain-of-function research, the lack of transparency and the subsequent cover-up have eroded public trust in public health institutions.
Watch this video compiling how mainstream media viewed the lab leak hypothesis – from a “crazy” conspiracy theory to a legitimate theory.
This video is from the You Silenced Me channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- Outbreak of multiple respiratory infections in China sparks global concerns over public health and CCP transparency.
- Was the Biden White House complicit in a COVID origins cover-up?
- Global Virome Project uncovered in China, involves research on over 500,000 viruses with biosecurity risks.
- Deborah Birx confirms efforts to SUPPRESS COVID-19 lab leak theory.
Sources include:
At Last, a Company With Integrity in the Gold IRA Industry
For several years, I’ve been vetting out precious metals companies in search of the best. I believe in gold and silver but it’s hard to find integrity in the Gold IRA industry. The vast majority operate with shady tactics and gigantic spreads that take advantage of Americans who simply want to protect their life’s savings.
I’ve found a handful that I like and I’ve worked with some of them. By no means would I “unrecommend” them because, again, I vetted them out and found them to be above the fold. Unfortunately, it isn’t hard to be better than the rest when the rest are so darn awful.
After years of searching, I finally found a company that truly operates with integrity. Augusta Precious Metals has three important attributes that set them far above the competition:
- Non-Commissioned Sales Team: I cannot stress how important and unique this is. With just about every other company in the Gold IRA industry, the sales teams make commission from every account they open. This means they steer their clients toward the gold and silver products with the highest commission. With Augusta Precious Metals, the team is solely focused on putting the best gold and silver for their clients into their IRA. They get paid to serve the best interests of the Gold IRA client, NOT their own commission pay.
- Incredibly Low Fees: Most Americans would be shocked if they knew the spread other Gold IRA companies charge. Augusta charges just 5% versus up to 45% elsewhere.
- No Pressure, No Gimmicks: There’s an understanding among most in the Gold IRA industry that fear and pressure is the way to go. Augusta Precious Metals takes a sober approach when working with clients because they hold integrity in the highest possible regard. This is why they don’t offer gimmicks like “free” or “bonus” silver. It’s also why they do not apply pressure tactics to get quick sales. Their educational and transparent approach to doing business is exceedingly rare in the Gold IRA industry.
